How gnome-software/systemd software upgrade dropped me to the grub command line, and how I resolved it

Earlier I was messing around in one of my Fedora Linux virtual machines. I’ve had this particular install since Fedora 23 was the latest release. I’ve upgraded it from 23 to 24 and then again from 24 to 25. I completed the upgrade a few weeks back and decided to come back to it. Of course, since it had been a few weeks, after I loaded it up and logged in, GNOME was telling me there were updates available in the Software (gnome-software) application.

Brief warning: this article contains a ton of screenshots as I worked the problem.

Mindlessly, I opened the gnome-software utility and decided to update the system through there. The updates looked pretty benign, whatever. I clicked ‘Restart & Install’ and confirmed. The system rebooted and brought me to the systemd installing updates prompt, awesome. It finished and rebooted once more, however I was immediately dumped to a grub command line. Uh oh.

So I took the #fedora IRC channel on Freenode, explained what had happened, and got some interesting feedback.

First, we tried to identify the problem. We started by trying to figure out why grub command line was coming up immediately while booting rather than the grub boot menu. I found that the grub config file was in fact empty, pretty straightforward then why we’re met with the grub command line.

My initial thought is the gnome-software utility told systemd to reboot for updates, but systemd didn’t install updates correctly. There was probably a kernel update and the grub config got caught in the mess. A little more trial and error with the fellas in #fedora and I was able to tell grub to boot the vmlinuz and initramfs files still visibly present.

Booting didn’t work though. A kernel panic came up while booting, Linux couldn’t mount the root filesystem.

Now I’m wondering if my hard disk is somehow corrupted after the updates. Obviously an update didn’t finish correctly, that much is obvious.

I head back to the #fedora IRC channel and suggest that I try booting the Live CD iso instead to dig around any further, I was tired of messing around in grub’s command line. They agreed this would in fact aid diagnosing the issue, so off I went.

I identified that the hard disk is using a single LVM partition, there are no other partitions on the Master Boot Record (MBR) of the disk. And the LVM partition only has a single logical volume in it called root with the / mount point and is xfs formatted. Pretty strange, and I don’t remember why I chose this layout so long ago.

I decide to remove the Live CD iso from the machine and reboot. What happened next though was pretty weird. I had looked away for a bit to check the IRC channel, when I came back, the machine had booted!

What the hell. Alright, so might as well browse around then. I logged in. I even was greeted with the message that updates were installed successfully!

I decided to open Terminal and verify the disk layout:

Yup. That’s a lvm-xfs partitioned disk. There is in fact no /boot partition, which means the single / partition is the /boot partition. By this point, the people over in #fedora were pretty grateful grub has matured to be able to understand booting LVM partitions, but they were at a loss for words for what was going on as well.

After talking with the #fedora IRC channel some more, I agree to figure out what state causes the machine to drop to the grub command line after upgrading.

I began going through each variable in my tests:

  • Default partitioning format
  • Custom partitioning format
  • Upgrading system using gnome-software
  • Upgrading system using dnf

The default partitioning format is just as you would expect–you load up the Live CD iso with a blank hard disk, you install Fedora to that hard disk using the default partitioning that anaconda chooses for you. No modifications.

The custom partitioning format is a bit different. You start with a single LVM partition and then you create an xfs partitioned with the / mount point:

I and the people in the #fedora IRC both found that installing Fedora with the custom partitioning format and upgrading using gnome-software would cause Fedora to be dropped to the grub command line every time, and only repairable by booting the Live CD iso again and mounting the filesystem so that the xfs journal is replayed after the updates.

Getting to that diagnosis though took several hours, and after confirming with others I opened the bug report over at Red Hat: Bug 1416650 – Upgrading using gnome-software/systemd with lvm-xfs custom partitioning format causes grub boot failure

Hopefully I get an answer back from the Fedora and/or Red Hat teams. Quite a head scratcher at first, but obviously a bug since it’s supposed to be supported and doesn’t indicate otherwise.


I got my car back today

I woke up at 5pm Sunday evening, thinking alright I’ll spend the night chatting with friends and playing games, no big deal. That night, I try to go to sleep at 3am, and I just sort of lay there in my bed until 7am rolled around, and I decided I’m not going to sleep for 1 hour until my alarm goes off. Insomnia is terrible. So, I decide since it’s Monday, before I go in to work at 9am, I’m going to go pick up my car, cause it’s ready to be picked up so why not?

Well, let me tell you. What a day today has been.

A little background: I drive a 2014 Honda Civic. I absolutely love the car since the day I picked it out and drove it off the lot. Fast forward two years later, I was hit by someone on my way to work, to the driver-side rear bumper. The damage wasn’t too bad, the car still drove and functioned as it should, and it didn’t even leak when wet, but still it needed to get repaired since there’s still payments left and there’s an insurance claim. I take it in to my local Honda Collision Center and get situated with a 2017 Toyota Corolla rental.

The Corolla only had around 6,200 miles on it when they handed the keys to me. My Civic had about 21,000 miles. There’s several reasons I chose my Civic over the other entry-level sedans like the Corolla, most of them are preference but a few things stood out immediately even on the 2017 Corolla when compared to my 2014 Civic:

  • The headlights. My Civic has halogen bulbs. The Corolla has LED bulbs. This was a huge difference I wasn’t immediately used to but enjoyed as I rode the rental for a while. LED bulbs are actually pretty neat.
  • The engine, accelerator, and brake. They’re just not the same. I don’t expect them to be, they’re two different cars after all. But, just after being stopped at a red light accelerating to 35 mph, the Corolla would accelerate up to 3500 rpm easily, however my Civic would only need 1500 rpm to do the same task.
  • The rear-view back-up camera. My 2014 Civic’s camera has a HUD that aligns itself with the steering wheel, allowing ease of movement while geared in reverse. The Corolla’s camera does not have a HUD that steers with the steering wheel. In addition, the Corolla’s camera was very foggy even after rubbing and cleaning, yet my Civic has a crystal clear picture.

With that out of the way, it’s 7am, I get dressed for the day and head to the collision center to pick up my car and drop off the rental. They had the car out to me within 5 minutes, pretty speedy no issue at all. Only immediately notice one problem and that was on the driver-side rear seatbelt, the plastic chassis behind the seatbelt wasn’t clipped into the interior wall. They took it back, had it fixed within 5 minutes, and back out to me again. I give it a good look over, I’ve even been described as conscientious before. No other problems that I see. The interior smells like fresh paint, of course. The paint job looks fresh, I can tell they waxed it and put a new clear coat on. I sign the paperwork that I received the car. Cool, I have my car back! But wait, I still have to turn in the rental…

[This post was never fully drafted. It ends there. Sorry.]

Replacing your server is not always necessary after encountering boot failure

First, a little background context before I dive in to how I recovered the virtual machine from boot failure…

  • The host has three physical disks mapped to the virtual machine which I’ll be recovering.
    • One disk is a 256 GB SSD and is unused/unallocated, the other two are 5 TB HDDs paired together via LVM to create a single 10 TB disk inside the guest’s filesystem.
  • The host runs Windows 7 64-bit, runs VirtualBox 5.1.10, and the guest runs Fedora 25 64-bit on Linux kernel 4.8.15-300.fc25.x86_64.
  • The guest uses SystemD and is referred to as ‘seedbox’ in my logs and snapshots.

Earlier this morning, the host completely froze, not even so much as a BSOD. There is a hardware problem with the host’s RAM that I have yet to completely diagnose. I ended up pushing the reset button on the chassis. All running guests were immediately aborted due to my power reset.

The host system rebooted just fine. Upon turning back on all of the guests, the ‘seedbox’ guest entered into SystemD emergency mode while it was booting. Uh oh.

Turns out that when the host rebooted, the physical disk mappings present for the guest were changed by either Windows or the host’s BIOS itself, and VirtualBox was not aware or did not track the difference. The SSD and one of the HDDs were no longer the correct physical disks. The LVM volume group was therefore invalid and auto-mounting the LVM logical volume failed. This was the root cause of boot failure within the guest.

Okay, so we’ve now identified the cause of boot failure. What about recovery? Is all the data corrupt now?

The guest failed to mount the LVM logical volume, which prevented it from possibly writing to the disks, causing corruption. The SSD and HDDs were never mounted by Linux, not even in read-only, so they were preserved during the boot failure. This is a good indicator that the data should be completely intact if we can rebuild the mapping.

Looking into correcting the physical to virtual disk mapping, I found out that due to the shift in mappings, the newly assigned physical disks were actually possibly catastrophic. One of them was the host’s boot drive, which even VirtualBox says NEVER to mount in a guest: “Most importantly, do not attempt to boot the partition with the currently running host operating system in a guest. This will lead to severe data corruption” [VirtualBox Manual 9.9.1]. I quickly commented out the auto-mount for that LVM logical volume and powered off the virtual machine, then looked into correcting the mapping via the host.

In VirtualBox, if you want to map physical disks to virtual ones, you need to run a utility called VBoxManage as root/administrator, and call some internals of the utility that are vaguely documented in section 9.9.1 in the advanced topics chapter of the VirtualBox manual (link). This is non-trivial for those just getting started with virtual machines and disk management, since there’s a high risk for corruption, as the manual indicates. If you map your host’s physical boot disk to the guest, then try to boot off of it, you’ll almost always cause severe corruption, this is what the manual is warning everyone about.

So off I went. I opened up the Command Prompt in administrator mode on the host and went to the directory the virtual disk files were in. In the VirtualBox window, I removed the disks from VirtualBox’s Media Manager, then switched back to Command Prompt. I then replaced the .vmdk files with new copies that had corrected physical drive ids. I then re-added the virtual disk files into VirtualBox, attached them to the seedbox guest, and booted up the guest.

The guest booted up successfully. Since I uncommented the failing drive configuration, it was able to boot normally, with only services relying on that mountpoint failing to run correctly. The core system was intact.

I uncommented the auto-mount line for the LVM logical volume I commented out earlier, re-mounted all auto-mounts via mount -a, and then listed the directory inside the LVM logical volume. Success!

I then rebooted the virtual machine and it came up all on its own in normal boot mode, no more emergency mode or boot failure. It acted as if it never fell ill.

To anyone this helped out or if this was a great story to read, I encourage you to follow me on social media or this blog, see you next time!